By Roger Harrabin Environment analyst Farmers' leaders have urged the government not to implement plans to cut subsidies by 15% and transfer the cash to wildlife protection.
The National Farmers Union (NFU) has written to every MP, saying the plan to share £3.5bn of farm grants would disadvantage British farmers.
The NFU also warns MPs that going ahead with the move would risk rural votes.
But wildlife groups have used newspaper advertisements to urge the government to keep its countryside commitments.
They also say votes are at stake as every household pays £400 a year to subsidise farmers - and people expect their money will be used to protect the environment, not just to shore up farmers' budgets.
In the summer, the EU set the framework for how the money should be spent with its scheme to "green" the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
The greening plans were heavily diluted under pressure from farmers, but large landowners will in future need to do more to collect subsidies by leaving existing grassland unploughed, diversifying their crops and setting aside some land for wildlife.
'Unfair transfer'What is being decided is exactly how the farm subsidy pot for in England and Wales should be divided between conflicting interests. The decision is tough because the overall size of the pot has shrunk as Europe's leaders attempted to shrink the £50bn CAP.
In England and Wales ministers have indicated a wish to shift the maximum allowable - 15% - away from direct payments to farmers - which is mostly for owning farmland. The money will go towards protecting wildlife and stimulating the rural economy.
End Quote Peter Kendall NFU president"The threat of disproportionate reductions in their payments...is making them angry and frustrated with this government"
The NFU letter to MPs says this is unfair to farmers in England and Wales because farmers elsewhere are being better protected. In Scotland the government has decided to shift 9.5% of subsidies away from direct payments.
The NFU also complains that the government appears ready to transfer this amount without having decided the purpose of the transfer.
President Peter Kendall says in the letter to MPs: "Farmers remain at a complete loss to understand what the government intends to use this money on, and how it can be used effectively for the benefit of their businesses.
"The threat of disproportionate reductions in their payments vis a vis their immediate competitors is making them angry and frustrated with this government."
Wildlife groups who take the opposite view believe Prime Minister David Cameron will be discussing the issue over the weekend.
The RSPB, which has registered huge losses in farmland birds through intensive subsidised farming, has taken a full-page advertisement in the Times warning: "This weekend the prime minister could cut the life from the English countryside."
Green groups say public money spent on subsidising farmers should go on public good like thriving wildlife and well-managed water catchment areas to retain water for use and to prevent flooding.
The decision on the share-out is imminent. The final division will be complicated, with firms supporting rural development also hoping to benefit from the 15% transfer of funds.
Follow Roger onTwitter @rharrabin
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Farmers protest against subsidy cuts
Dengan url
http://sarapanoatmeal.blogspot.com/2013/12/farmers-protest-against-subsidy-cuts.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Farmers protest against subsidy cuts
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Farmers protest against subsidy cuts
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar